The Tough Guide to Climate Denial

N.B. I have not actually written this book!

I have previously referred to Robert Henson’s Rough Guide to Climate Change, in which is included his summary of the positions adopted by those that claim to be “sceptical”. In the past, I have merely paraphrased what he said but, in view of the recent pronouncement of Dr Richard A Muller’s Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature (BEST) study (see my update to yesterday’s post), I will now simplify it to what I would like to call the 6 Pillars of Climate Denial: 1. Global warming is not happening. 2. Global warming is not man-made. 3. Global warming is not significant. 4. Global warming is not necessarily bad. 5. Global warming is not a problem. 6. Global warming is not worth fixing. (See Henson, 2007, p.257). If these are the 6 Pillars of Climate Denial, then Muller has just knocked over the first one. However, his road back to reality is a long one; and he has much catching-up to do. For example: In 1988 James Hansen attributed climate change to human activity; by 1998 the UN had rejected all of the above as being invalid; and by 2008 even the Communist Party of China had conceded that climate change arises out of development, and should thus be solved along with development” (Climate Change White Paper, p.13). However, let us examine these pillars more closely (for the purposes perhaps of potential “controlled demolition“)… — Pillars 1 to 3 are straightforward denial (whose days are clearly numbered). — Pillar 4 is what I have referred to as Cornucopian (the belief that nature will find a way to mitigate the problem), which includes claiming that CO2 is not a pollutant and that the benefits will outweigh the disadvantages. There is a precedent for this kind of denial, in that acid rain was originally perceived as a potentially-beneficial way of fertilising the soil with nitrates, phosphates and sulphates. — Pillar 5 is what I have referred to as Promethean (the belief that humans will find a way to mitigate the problem), which includes carbon capture and storage, geoengineering the atmosphere, and terraforming the planet Mars so that we can go and live there instead. These are dealing with the symptoms but not tackling the cause of the problem; and they are an abdication of our moral responsibility to all the other species with whom we share the Earth. — Pillar 6 is what I have referred to as Economic Rationalism; and may well be the hardest Pillar to knock down, although Sir Nicholas Stern made a very good effort at doing so in 2006. He was of course, somewhat predictably, vehemently attacked by fellow economists such as William Nordhaus for doing so. However, as he himself has since said, normal marginal cost-benefit analysis rules do not apply (Stern 2009, p.13): Deciding whether or not to tackle climate change is not like deciding whether to build a bypass or just put up with traffic congestion. On the contrary, deciding whether or not to tackle climate change is like deciding whether or not you want the Earth to be capable of supporting life as it is, in anything like current or expected numbers, human and non-human alike. As James Delingpole and his foolish kind might say, “Preservation of a habitable planet – what’s not to like?


About Rick Altman

Possibly just another 'Climate Cassandra' crying 'Wolf' in cyberspace. However, the moral of the old children's story is that the Wolf eventually turned up!
This entry was posted in Anthropocene, Capitalism, Carbon Capture and Storage, Civilisation, Climate Science, Consumerism, Economics, IPCC, James Delingpole, Mass Extinctions, Politics, UNFCCC and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

15 Responses to The Tough Guide to Climate Denial

  1. Pingback: Questions for Dr Richard A Muller | Anthropocene Reality

  2. Pingback: What’s wrong with Clean Coal? | Anthropocene Reality

  3. Pingback: Where the UK really matters | Anthropocene Reality

  4. Pingback: Fables about climate change? | Anthropocene Reality

  5. Pingback: First green superpower? | Anthropocene Reality

  6. Pingback: Pythagoras and plate-spinning for fake sceptics « Anthropocene Reality

  7. Pingback: Like farting in an elevator… « Anthropocene Reality

  8. Pingback: Muller knows BEST that Watts is wrong « Anthropocene Reality

  9. Pingback: Sampson and the Temple of Economic Dinosaurs « Anthropocene Reality

  10. Pingback: Fostering denial in the C of E (Part 2) « Anthropocene Reality

  11. Pingback: A cornucopia of Prometheanism | Anthropocene Reality

  12. Pingback: Breaking Bread, Oops, Ice and I | elcidharth

  13. Pingback: If global warming has stopped… | Anthropocene Reality

  14. Looks like quite a good read- get on and write it.


    • Anthropocene Reality says:

      Thanks Jules, but I think I did that! I just had to change the cover design and book title in order to avoid Copyright infringement. 😉


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s