I often used to tell people, “If you can’t say anything positive then don’t say anything at all!”. When it comes to this blog, however, I have repeatedly failed to take my own advice. I therefore think I may have to stop blogging unless or until I can be more positive. In the meantime, I would encourage all those who can to make their voices heard by engaging in positive collective action and/or peaceful public protest. In the UK, there is an opportunity to do this next week – on June 17 – and I do hope it remains peaceful. For the record, however, I have also added an addendum to my last post, which includes this link to an attempt by The Carbon Brief to be positive about the G7’s latest statement of intent: http://www.carbonbrief.org/blog/2015/06/g7-leaders-target-zero-carbon-economy/ Sadly, it too makes sobering reading – highlighting the similarities with the [then] G8’s pronouncements in 2009 and the fact that the [now] G7 produce less than 20% of global CO2 emissions. I would therefore agree with former Australian prime minister, Kevin Rudd, who suggested recently that the larger G20 must drive the planned global climate deal. Whatever happens, I hope we do not see further nefarious and/or criminal acts to prevent progress (e.g. such the entirely bogus ‘Climategate’ scandal in 2009).
-
Archives
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- December 2014
- July 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
-
Meta
“Whatever happens, I hope we do not see further nefarious and/or criminal acts to prevent progress (e.g. such the entirely bogus ‘Climategate’ scandal in 2009).” Well strange that you should write that and what do we see but the person who uttered this: “That said, GWPF has done some commendable things, notably pushing for inquiries into the Climategate affair…” as quoted in this article UK Climate Deniers Invite American Sceptic Judith Curry to Speak in the House of Lords, creating more uncertainty in her speech to whichever Lords were in attendance. Which considering the Gish Gallop of wrong uttered by Matt Ridley in a recent Quadrant (another right wing organ like the WSJ and Forbes) article indicates that these goons are far from done. There is now no doubt that Judith Curry is earning a ticket to the CATO institute to join Pat Michaels and Richard Lindzen.
LikeLike
I am very dismayed to hear all of that. To assert (as Curry does) that any supposed human causation is lost in the noise of natural variability, is to assert that the IPCC is part of a global ‘alarmist’ conspiracy. The goons may be far from done but they are, nonetheless, all being willfully blind to a reality that is now confirmed almost daily. I guess the Pope must now be added to their list of co-conspirators…
LikeLike
True to the core. Some drastic steps need to be taken or nature will take drastic measures..
LikeLike
Belated thanks for the comment (wrongly marked as Spam by WordPress).
LikeLike
We need nature but the nature does not need us. It has thrived and will thrive. If we want to thrive as a species we should take care.
LikeLike
Indeed, thankyou. Very reminiscent of the views of Edward O Wilson – as quoted at length by Paul and Anne Ehrlich in 1996 in ‘Betrayal of Science and Reason’. https://anthropocenereality.wordpress.com/2011/12/07/fables-about-biodiversity/
LikeLike