Thanks to NASA for clearing up this “mystery”…! See also some truly nutty comments on the Guardian page where the above-linked video was embedded: http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/us-news-blog/2012/dec/13/nasa-end-of-the-world-december-21 For more commentary from NASA see: http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/2012.html
-
Archives
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- December 2014
- July 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
-
Meta
There’s three things that concern me about nuts: (1) there’s lots of them; (2) it’s easy for deniers to lump all warnings of potential catastrophe as ‘alarmism’ by associating them with the truly crazy nuts; and (3) we have no decent nutcrackers.
LikeLike
Thanks. If so, I’d steer clear of the walnuts – just stick to dates and turkish delight – over the holiday period. 🙂
LikeLike
The final paragraph,
made me laugh. Why? Simple really, in the best tradition of the panto’ season, ‘Its behind you‘. Rationale, the planet is approaching from the side of the Earth below your feet.
LikeLike
Indeed. I posted a comment (making a similar point) in response to this particular bit of stupidity.
LikeLike
Rationale, the planet is approaching from the side of the Earth below your feet. I’m not entirely sure where you’re coming from, or going, with this: a) for it to be ‘behind’ you all the time, it would have to be approaching on a pretty wacky orbit that corkscrews around, far faster than the Earth spins, and in complete synchronisation with the Earth’s rotation to boot; b) even if (a) were the case, it would still be clearly visible to everyone who happens to be standing on the other side of the planet from you. I can only conclude you’re making a joke — and I’ve missed it completely. So, sorry! 🙂
LikeLike